
Core Ultra 7 266V
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2183IT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 266V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 100W, a 83W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2518 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,274 vs 19,377).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2183IT, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Xeon D-2183IT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2183IT
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 266V across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌488.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2518 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 266V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 266V
2024Xeon D-2183IT
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 100W, a 83W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2518 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,274 vs 19,377).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2183IT, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Xeon D-2183IT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 266V across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌488.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2518 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 266V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 266V better than Xeon D-2183IT?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 335 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 213 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 415 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 266V and Xeon D-2183IT

Core Ultra 7 266V
Core Ultra 7 266V
The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2183IT
Xeon D-2183IT
The Xeon D-2183IT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2518. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,377 points. Launch price was $1,764.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 266V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-2183IT offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2183IT has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V versus 3 GHz on the Xeon D-2183IT — a 50% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 266V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon D-2183IT uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 266V scores 19,274 against the Xeon D-2183IT's 19,377 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon D-2183IT. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 266V vs 22 MB on the Xeon D-2183IT.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+67% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 22 MB+83% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 16 MB+540% |
| Process | 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 19,274 | 19,377 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-2183IT uses FCBGA2518 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 266V | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FCBGA2518 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













