
EPYC 9655P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9655P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌281% higher power demand at 400W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10,362 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 315.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 400W, a 295W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 160,490).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9655P, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9655P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9655P
2024Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10,362 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 315.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 400W, a 295W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌281% higher power demand at 400W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9655P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 160,490).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9655P, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9655P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9655P better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 589 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1047 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 939 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 821 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 744 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 839 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 733 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 641 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 562 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655P and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P
The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9655P packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9655P has 88 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 9655P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655P scores 160,490 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 141.1% lead for the EPYC 9655P. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192+1100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+1100% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 160,490+479% | 27,712 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 24,287 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9655P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9655P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the EPYC 9655P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9655P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the EPYC 9655P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9655P launched at $10811 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($10811 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $10362 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 122.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9655P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10811 | $449-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8 | 61.7+317% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












