Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E7-4830

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 105W, a 99W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1567 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 19,981).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4830, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E7-4830

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌1650% higher power demand at 105W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1567, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Xeon E7-4830

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 105W, a 99W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1567 and older memory support.

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 19,981).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4830, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌1650% higher power demand at 105W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1567, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Xeon E7-4830?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E7-4830 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4830 is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2011) and a healthier platform with FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5 instead of LGA1567. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 Benchmark Check

Xeon E7-4830 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 PRO 220	Xeon E7-4830
1080p
low	259 FPS	156 FPS
medium	237 FPS	135 FPS
high	199 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	229 FPS	132 FPS
medium	191 FPS	112 FPS
high	155 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	62 FPS
medium	134 FPS	56 FPS
high	104 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	34 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220 Open Xeon E7-4830

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 PRO 220	Xeon E7-4830
1080p
low	386 FPS	188 FPS
medium	320 FPS	170 FPS
high	284 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	122 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	162 FPS
medium	280 FPS	149 FPS
high	255 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	218 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	243 FPS	106 FPS
medium	214 FPS	98 FPS
high	201 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	69 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220 Open Xeon E7-4830

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 PRO 220	Xeon E7-4830
1080p
low	497 FPS	500 FPS
medium	497 FPS	500 FPS
high	497 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	500 FPS
1440p
low	497 FPS	500 FPS
medium	497 FPS	500 FPS
high	497 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	430 FPS	478 FPS
4K
low	484 FPS	432 FPS
medium	425 FPS	349 FPS
high	362 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	261 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220 Open Xeon E7-4830

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 PRO 220	Xeon E7-4830
1080p
low	497 FPS	500 FPS
medium	497 FPS	500 FPS
high	497 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	500 FPS
1440p
low	497 FPS	500 FPS
medium	497 FPS	500 FPS
high	497 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	472 FPS
4K
low	497 FPS	500 FPS
medium	497 FPS	490 FPS
high	441 FPS	434 FPS
ultra	377 FPS	359 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220 Open Xeon E7-4830

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Xeon E7-4830

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E7-4830

The Xeon E7-4830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EX (2011) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 19,981 points. Launch price was $2,059.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E7-4830 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E7-4830 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4830 — a 68.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses Westmere-EX (2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Xeon E7-4830's 19,981 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E7-4830. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-4830.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 220	Xeon E7-4830
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+104%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+50%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	6 MB+2300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-88%	32 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)	Westmere-EX (2011)
PassMark	19,889	19,981
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,696
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,382

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 220	Xeon E7-4830
Socket	FP7/FP7r2	LGA1567
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	2048 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	0