
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of FP7 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 20,084).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 6W vs 4W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 6W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on FP7, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of FP7 and older memory support.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 6W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 20,084).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 6W vs 4W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on FP7, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z better than Ryzen 5 PRO 220?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 195 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
The Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 20,084 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z uses Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z's 20,084 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z. Both processors carry 16 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+3% | 4.75 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+19% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Process | 4 nm-33% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) | Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 19,889 | 20,084 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











