Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

6 Cores12 Thrd6 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2699 v3

18 Cores36 Thrd145 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 6W instead of 145W, a 139W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 20,028).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v3, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • +181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 2316.7% higher power demand at 145W vs 6W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Xeon E5-2699 v3?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2699 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699 v3 is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2014) and a healthier platform with FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 PRO 220Xeon E5-2699 v3
1080p
low259 FPS181 FPS
medium237 FPS158 FPS
high199 FPS126 FPS
ultra171 FPS101 FPS
1440p
low229 FPS152 FPS
medium191 FPS128 FPS
high155 FPS99 FPS
ultra137 FPS81 FPS
4K
low159 FPS69 FPS
medium134 FPS62 FPS
high104 FPS48 FPS
ultra92 FPS39 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 PRO 220Xeon E5-2699 v3
1080p
low386 FPS368 FPS
medium320 FPS334 FPS
high284 FPS282 FPS
ultra248 FPS227 FPS
1440p
low324 FPS316 FPS
medium280 FPS287 FPS
high255 FPS245 FPS
ultra218 FPS190 FPS
4K
low243 FPS197 FPS
medium214 FPS180 FPS
high201 FPS155 FPS
ultra169 FPS122 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 PRO 220Xeon E5-2699 v3
1080p
low497 FPS501 FPS
medium497 FPS501 FPS
high497 FPS501 FPS
ultra497 FPS501 FPS
1440p
low497 FPS501 FPS
medium497 FPS501 FPS
high497 FPS501 FPS
ultra430 FPS501 FPS
4K
low484 FPS461 FPS
medium425 FPS375 FPS
high362 FPS341 FPS
ultra299 FPS284 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 PRO 220Xeon E5-2699 v3
1080p
low497 FPS501 FPS
medium497 FPS501 FPS
high497 FPS501 FPS
ultra497 FPS501 FPS
1440p
low497 FPS501 FPS
medium497 FPS501 FPS
high497 FPS501 FPS
ultra497 FPS501 FPS
4K
low497 FPS501 FPS
medium497 FPS501 FPS
high441 FPS459 FPS
ultra377 FPS385 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Xeon E5-2699 v3

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-2699 v3

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 20,028 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 — a 30.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Xeon E5-2699 v3's 20,028 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v3. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699 v3.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 220Xeon E5-2699 v3
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+36%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+39%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB
45 MB (total)+181%
L2 Cache
6 MB+2300%
256K (per core)
Process
4 nm-82%
22 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
19,889
20,028
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 220Xeon E5-2699 v3
Socket
FP7/FP7r2
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2400
Max RAM Capacity
1536
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v3). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2699 v3 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 220Xeon E5-2699 v3
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d