
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2699 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 145W, a 139W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 20,028).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v3, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2699 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌2316.7% higher power demand at 145W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Xeon E5-2699 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 145W, a 139W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 20,028).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v3, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌2316.7% higher power demand at 145W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Xeon E5-2699 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Xeon E5-2699 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Xeon E5-2699 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 122 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Xeon E5-2699 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 501 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Xeon E5-2699 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Xeon E5-2699 v3


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2699 v3
Xeon E5-2699 v3
The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 20,028 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 — a 30.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Xeon E5-2699 v3's 20,028 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v3. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Xeon E5-2699 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 18 / 36+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+36% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+39% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 45 MB (total)+181% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+2300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-82% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 19,889 | 20,028 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Xeon E5-2699 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v3). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2699 v3 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Xeon E5-2699 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











