
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 4700G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 20,180).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 4700G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 4700G
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Ryzen 7 4700G
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 20,180).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 4700G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Ryzen 7 4700G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 266 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 368 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 7 4700G


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 4700G
Ryzen 7 4700G
The Ryzen 7 4700G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,180 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4700G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 4700G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4700G — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4700G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Ryzen 7 4700G's 20,180 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 4700G. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 4700G.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 19,889 | 20,180+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 4700G uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 4700G). The Ryzen 7 4700G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 4700G targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (8CU) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 4700G debuted at $299. On MSRP ($0 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $299 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 4700G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 67.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











