
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 5 340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen AI 5 340
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,776 vs 19,889).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Ryzen AI 5 340
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,776 vs 19,889).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Ryzen AI 5 340?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 85 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 363 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen AI 5 340


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI 5 340
Ryzen AI 5 340
The Ryzen AI 5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,776 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen AI 5 340 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 340 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 340 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Ryzen AI 5 340's 19,776 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 340.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+60% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) | Krackan Point (2025) |
| PassMark | 19,889 | 19,776 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 340 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($0 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 5 340 is $0 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











