Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs Ryzen AI 5 340

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

6 Cores12 Thrd6 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen AI 5 340

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen AI 5 340

2025

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (19,776 vs 19,889).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
    • 366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Ryzen AI 5 340?
    Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 26.7% average FPS lead across 32 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 26.7% more average FPS across 32 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 5 PRO 220 still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 26.7% average FPS lead across 32 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetRyzen 5 PRO 220Ryzen AI 5 340
    1080p
    low259 FPS245 FPS
    medium237 FPS227 FPS
    high199 FPS192 FPS
    ultra171 FPS165 FPS
    1440p
    low229 FPS215 FPS
    medium191 FPS181 FPS
    high155 FPS149 FPS
    ultra137 FPS131 FPS
    4K
    low159 FPS149 FPS
    medium134 FPS126 FPS
    high104 FPS98 FPS
    ultra92 FPS85 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetRyzen 5 PRO 220Ryzen AI 5 340
    1080p
    low386 FPS173 FPS
    medium320 FPS146 FPS
    high284 FPS132 FPS
    ultra248 FPS116 FPS
    1440p
    low324 FPS146 FPS
    medium280 FPS126 FPS
    high255 FPS117 FPS
    ultra218 FPS101 FPS
    4K
    low243 FPS121 FPS
    medium214 FPS107 FPS
    high201 FPS99 FPS
    ultra169 FPS83 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetRyzen 5 PRO 220Ryzen AI 5 340
    1080p
    low497 FPS494 FPS
    medium497 FPS494 FPS
    high497 FPS494 FPS
    ultra497 FPS403 FPS
    1440p
    low497 FPS494 FPS
    medium497 FPS483 FPS
    high497 FPS418 FPS
    ultra430 FPS340 FPS
    4K
    low484 FPS399 FPS
    medium425 FPS337 FPS
    high362 FPS290 FPS
    ultra299 FPS230 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetRyzen 5 PRO 220Ryzen AI 5 340
    1080p
    low497 FPS494 FPS
    medium497 FPS494 FPS
    high497 FPS494 FPS
    ultra497 FPS494 FPS
    1440p
    low497 FPS494 FPS
    medium497 FPS494 FPS
    high497 FPS494 FPS
    ultra497 FPS494 FPS
    4K
    low497 FPS494 FPS
    medium497 FPS473 FPS
    high441 FPS419 FPS
    ultra377 FPS363 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen AI 5 340

    AMD

    Ryzen 5 PRO 220

    The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

    AMD

    Ryzen AI 5 340

    The Ryzen AI 5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,776 points. Launch price was $299.

    Processing Power

    Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen AI 5 340 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 340 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 340 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Ryzen AI 5 340's 19,776 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 340.

    FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 220Ryzen AI 5 340
    Cores / Threads
    6 / 12
    6 / 12
    Boost Clock
    4.9 GHz+2%
    4.8 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.2 GHz+60%
    2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    16 MB+100%
    8 MB
    L2 Cache
    6 MB+500%
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    4 nm
    4 nm
    Architecture
    Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
    Krackan Point (2025)
    PassMark
    19,889
    19,776
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 340 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 220Ryzen AI 5 340
    Socket
    FP7/FP7r2
    FP8
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    💰

    Value Analysis

    The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($0 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 5 340 is $0 cheaper.

    FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 220Ryzen AI 5 340
    MSRP
    $0
    $0
    Release Date
    2025
    2025