
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 105W, a 99W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.2% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1650% higher power demand at 105W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 105W, a 99W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.2% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1650% higher power demand at 105W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen 5 PRO 220?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 832 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 974 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 974 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 934 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 959 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 843 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 694 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 9 5900X


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 64.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 64 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 19,889 | 38,955+96% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. On MSRP ($0 vs $549), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $549 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 71.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











