
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 5 PRO 220?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 220 and Ryzen 7 3700X


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 scores 19,889 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 12% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 19,889 | 22,430+13% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($0 vs $329), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $329 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 68.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











