
Ryzen 5 8400F
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2170B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2170B, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon W-2170B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W-2170B
2017Why buy it
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,448 vs 24,554).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8400F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024Xeon W-2170B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2170B, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon W-2170B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,448 vs 24,554).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8400F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8400F better than Xeon W-2170B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 178 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 603 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 557 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 410 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8400F and Xeon W-2170B


Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F
The Ryzen 5 8400F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,554 points. Launch price was $170.

Xeon W-2170B
Xeon W-2170B
The Xeon W-2170B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,448 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2170B offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2170B has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2170B — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8400F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8400F uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-2170B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8400F scores 24,554 against the Xeon W-2170B's 24,448 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 8400F. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8400F vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2170B.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 28+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+9% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+68% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 19.25 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 24,554 | 24,448 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2170B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











