
Ryzen 5 8400F
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6143
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.0 vs 72.5 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,554 vs 24,786).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6143, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon Gold 6143
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.5 vs 81.0 PassMark/$ ($342 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8400F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024Xeon Gold 6143
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.0 vs 72.5 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $342 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,554 vs 24,786).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6143, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.5 vs 81.0 PassMark/$ ($342 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8400F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8400F better than Xeon Gold 6143?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 144 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 603 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8400F and Xeon Gold 6143


Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F
The Ryzen 5 8400F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,554 points. Launch price was $170.

Xeon Gold 6143
Xeon Gold 6143
The Xeon Gold 6143 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,786 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6143 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6143 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8400F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6143 — a 16.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8400F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8400F is built on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8400F scores 24,554 against the Xeon Gold 6143's 24,786 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6143. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8400F vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6143.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+18% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+50% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 22 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (2023−2024) | — |
| PassMark | 24,554 | 24,786 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6143 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 8400F launched at $303 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6143 debuted at $342. On MSRP ($303 vs $342), the Ryzen 5 8400F is $39 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 8400F delivers 81.0 pts/$ vs 72.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6143 — making the Ryzen 5 8400F the 11.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $303-11% | $342 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.0+12% | 72.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











