
Ryzen 5 8400F
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5415+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5415+ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,554 vs 24,842).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5415+, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5415+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5415+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024Xeon Gold 5415+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5415+ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,554 vs 24,842).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5415+, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5415+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5415+ better than Ryzen 5 8400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 603 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 621 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 314 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8400F and Xeon Gold 5415+


Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F
The Ryzen 5 8400F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,554 points. Launch price was $170.

Xeon Gold 5415+
Xeon Gold 5415+
The Xeon Gold 5415+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,842 points. Launch price was $1,076.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5415+ offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 5415+ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8400F versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5415+ — a 13.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8400F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8400F uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8400F scores 24,554 against the Xeon Gold 5415+'s 24,842 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 5415+. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8400F vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5415+.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+15% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+45% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 22.5 MB+41% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 24,554 | 24,842+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8400F | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











