
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 22,921).
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 22,921).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7640HS better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 313 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS


Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 22,921 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 7640HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+2% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+30% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-33% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,921 | 22,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,670 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,609 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 7640HS) / Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












