
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 6800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 22,932).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 6800H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 6800H
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Ryzen 7 6800H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 22,932).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 6800H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7640HS better than Ryzen 7 6800H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 313 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 6800H


Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 6800H
Ryzen 7 6800H
The Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,932 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 6800H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 6800H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800H — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 6800H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 22,921 against the Ryzen 7 6800H's 22,932 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 7 6800H. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+6% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+34% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-33% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,921 | 22,932 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,957 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,845 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,861 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 6800H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 7640HS) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 6800H). The Ryzen 7 6800H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 6800H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 6800H rivals Core i7-12700H.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












