
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 23,008).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3800X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Ryzen 7 3800X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,921 vs 23,008).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3800X better than Ryzen 5 7640HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 313 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 401 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 348 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 244 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 287 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 575 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 425 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 3800X


Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 3800X
Ryzen 7 3800X
The Ryzen 7 3800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,008 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3800X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800X — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3800X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 22,921 against the Ryzen 7 3800X's 23,008 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3800X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3800X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+11% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+10% | 3.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,921 | 23,008 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 7640HS) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












