
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7735HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7735HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7735HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,897 vs 22,921).
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Ryzen 7 7735HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7735HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,897 vs 22,921).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7640HS better than Ryzen 7 7735HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 313 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 195 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 520 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 365 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 376 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 7735HS


Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7735HS
Ryzen 7 7735HS
The Ryzen 7 7735HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,897 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7735HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7735HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735HS — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7735HS uses Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 22,921 against the Ryzen 7 7735HS's 22,897 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 7640HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+5% | 4.75 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+34% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-33% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 22,921 | 22,897 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,800 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 7640HS) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735HS). The Ryzen 7 7735HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 5 7640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735HS targets High Performance Laptop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












