
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,777 vs 22,921).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7640HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,777 vs 22,921).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7640HS better than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 313 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 569 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 534 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 222 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 569 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 569 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 569 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 552 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700


Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,777 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 22,921 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700's 22,777 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 7640HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+14% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+19% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,921 | 22,777 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












