
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 22,921).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 22,921).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7640HS better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 313 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7640HS and Ryzen 7 3700X


Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,921 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7640HS versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7640HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 22,921 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 2.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 7640HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7640HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+14% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+19% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,921+2% | 22,430 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7640HS | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












