
Ryzen 5 3400GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2450 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,825 vs 9,057).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2450 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2450 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2450 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019Xeon E5-2450 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,825 vs 9,057).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2450 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2450 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3400GE better than Xeon E5-2450 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3400GE | Xeon E5-2450 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3400GE | Xeon E5-2450 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 109 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3400GE | Xeon E5-2450 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3400GE | Xeon E5-2450 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E5-2450 v2


Ryzen 5 3400GE
Ryzen 5 3400GE
The Ryzen 5 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 8,825 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2450 v2
Xeon E5-2450 v2
The Xeon E5-2450 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,057 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3400GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2450 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2450 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400GE versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2450 v2 — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3400GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3400GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2450 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3400GE scores 8,825 against the Xeon E5-2450 v2's 9,057 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2450 v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400GE vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2450 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3400GE | Xeon E5-2450 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+21% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+32% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-45% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 8,825 | 9,057+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2450 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3400GE | Xeon E5-2450 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












