
Processor U300
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3400GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Processor U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3400GE across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 59.2 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.2 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,825 vs 8,897).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Processor U300
2023Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.2 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3400GE across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 59.2 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,825 vs 8,897).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Processor U300 better than Ryzen 5 3400GE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Processor U300 and Ryzen 5 3400GE

Processor U300
Processor U300
The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.


Ryzen 5 3400GE
Ryzen 5 3400GE
The Ryzen 5 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 8,825 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Processor U300 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3400GE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Processor U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400GE — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Processor U300 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Processor U300 uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Processor U300 scores 8,897 against the Ryzen 5 3400GE's 8,825 — a 0.8% lead for the Processor U300. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400GE.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6+25% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+175% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-17% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 8,897 | 8,825 |
Memory & Platform
The Processor U300 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Processor U300 launched at $193 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3400GE debuted at $149. On MSRP ($193 vs $149), the Ryzen 5 3400GE is $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor U300 delivers 46.1 pts/$ vs 59.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3400GE — making the Ryzen 5 3400GE the 24.9% better value option.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193 | $149-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.1 | 59.2+28% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












