
Processor U300
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 2400G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Processor U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 51.7 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400G.
Ryzen 5 2400G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon RX Vega 11, while Processor U300 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Processor U300.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,734 vs 8,897).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Processor U300
2023Ryzen 5 2400G
2018Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon RX Vega 11, while Processor U300 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Processor U300.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 51.7 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400G.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,734 vs 8,897).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Processor U300 better than Ryzen 5 2400G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Processor U300 and Ryzen 5 2400G

Processor U300
Processor U300
The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.


Ryzen 5 2400G
Ryzen 5 2400G
The Ryzen 5 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $169.
Processing Power
The Processor U300 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2400G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Processor U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400G — a 12% clock advantage for the Processor U300 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Processor U300 uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Processor U300 scores 8,897 against the Ryzen 5 2400G's 8,734 — a 1.8% lead for the Processor U300. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400G.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6+25% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+13% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+200% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 8,897+2% | 8,734 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 4,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,040 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,250 |
Memory & Platform
The Processor U300 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Processor U300) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 2400G). The Ryzen 5 2400G includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 11), while the Processor U300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2400G targets Entry Gaming Desktop.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Entry Gaming Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Processor U300 launched at $193 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 2400G debuted at $169. On MSRP ($193 vs $169), the Ryzen 5 2400G is $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor U300 delivers 46.1 pts/$ vs 51.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 2400G — making the Ryzen 5 2400G the 11.4% better value option.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193 | $169-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.1 | 51.7+12% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












