Processor U300
Popular choices:
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Processor U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,897 vs 9,056).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.8 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Processor U300
2023Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.8 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,897 vs 9,056).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G better than Processor U300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 110 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 226 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Processor U300 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Processor U300
Processor U300
The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,056 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Processor U300 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Processor U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Processor U300 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Processor U300 uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Processor U300 scores 8,897 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 9,056 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300 vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6+25% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+5% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+208% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB+60% |
| Process | 10 nm-17% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 8,897 | 9,056+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Processor U300 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Processor U300 launched at $193 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G debuted at $149. On MSRP ($193 vs $149), the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor U300 delivers 46.1 pts/$ vs 60.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G the 27.5% better value option.
| Feature | Processor U300 | Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $193 | $149-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.1 | 60.8+32% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Processor U300 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
