Ryzen 5 3400GE vs Xeon E3-1270 v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3400GE

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 72W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1270 v6 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,825 vs 8,937).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1270 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1270 v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌105.7% higher power demand at 72W vs 35W.

Ryzen 5 3400GE

2019

Xeon E3-1270 v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 72W, a 37W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1270 v6 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,825 vs 8,937).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1270 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌105.7% higher power demand at 72W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1270 v6 better than Ryzen 5 3400GE?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E3-1270 v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3400GE is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1270 v6 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1270 v6 is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1270 v6 is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1270 v6 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3400GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the smarter recommendation now. At roughly 8,825 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3400GE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 3400GE Benchmark Check

Xeon E3-1270 v6 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3400GE	Xeon E3-1270 v6
1080p
low	172 FPS	203 FPS
medium	151 FPS	158 FPS
high	124 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	170 FPS
medium	121 FPS	131 FPS
high	96 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	71 FPS
medium	58 FPS	58 FPS
high	46 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3400GE Open Xeon E3-1270 v6

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3400GE	Xeon E3-1270 v6
1080p
low	218 FPS	223 FPS
medium	189 FPS	222 FPS
high	173 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	187 FPS	223 FPS
medium	161 FPS	199 FPS
high	147 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	120 FPS	155 FPS
4K
low	138 FPS	186 FPS
medium	123 FPS	161 FPS
high	97 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	114 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3400GE Open Xeon E3-1270 v6

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 3400GE	Xeon E3-1270 v6
1080p
low	221 FPS	223 FPS
medium	221 FPS	223 FPS
high	221 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	223 FPS
1440p
low	221 FPS	223 FPS
medium	221 FPS	223 FPS
high	221 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	223 FPS
4K
low	221 FPS	223 FPS
medium	221 FPS	223 FPS
high	221 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	223 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3400GE Open Xeon E3-1270 v6

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 3400GE	Xeon E3-1270 v6
1080p
low	221 FPS	223 FPS
medium	221 FPS	223 FPS
high	221 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	223 FPS
1440p
low	221 FPS	223 FPS
medium	221 FPS	223 FPS
high	221 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	223 FPS
4K
low	221 FPS	223 FPS
medium	221 FPS	223 FPS
high	221 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	223 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3400GE Open Xeon E3-1270 v6

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1270 v6

Ryzen 5 3400GE

The Ryzen 5 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 8,825 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1270 v6

The Xeon E3-1270 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 72 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,937 points. Launch price was $328.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 3400GE and Xeon E3-1270 v6 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400GE versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1270 v6 — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1270 v6 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3400GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1270 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3400GE scores 8,825 against the Xeon E3-1270 v6's 8,937 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E3-1270 v6. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400GE vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1270 v6.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3400GE	Xeon E3-1270 v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.2 GHz+5%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.8 GHz+15%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB+100%
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	8,825	8,937+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1270 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.