
Ryzen 3 8300GE
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4210
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 12 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 14 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4210, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4210 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4210
2019Why buy it
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (14 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 12 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,463 vs 13,568).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 8300GE
2024Xeon Silver 4210
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 12 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (14 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 14 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4210, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4210 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 12 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,463 vs 13,568).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 8300GE better than Xeon Silver 4210?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon Silver 4210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon Silver 4210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon Silver 4210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon Silver 4210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 333 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 8300GE and Xeon Silver 4210


Ryzen 3 8300GE
Ryzen 3 8300GE
The Ryzen 3 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,568 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Silver 4210
Xeon Silver 4210
The Xeon Silver 4210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,463 points. Launch price was $501.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 8300GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4210 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Silver 4210 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300GE versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4210 — a 42% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 8300GE uses the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4210 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 13,568 against the Xeon Silver 4210's 13,463 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 8300GE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300GE vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Silver 4210.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon Silver 4210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+53% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+59% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 13.75 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 10 MB+900% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix2 (2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 13,568 | 13,463 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 8300GE uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4210 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon Silver 4210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 8300GE) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4210).
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon Silver 4210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












