
Core 5 120UL
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 7330U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7330U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 10,645).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $277 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7330U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 3 7330U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 5 120UL
2024Ryzen 3 7330U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7330U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 10,645).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $277 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7330U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 7330U better than Core 5 120UL?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 191 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Ryzen 3 7330U

Core 5 120UL
Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 7330U
Ryzen 3 7330U
The Ryzen 3 7330U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,645 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 7330U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 5 120UL has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7330U — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core 5 120UL (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7330U uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Ryzen 3 7330U's 10,645 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 7330U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7330U.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+7% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz+77% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 10,558 | 10,645 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 7330U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











