Core 5 120UL vs Core i5-9600KF

Intel

Core 5 120UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i5-9600KF

6 Cores6 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 120UL

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB).
  • Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 10,646).
  • 5.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $277 MSRPvs$262 MSRP

Core i5-9600KF

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $15 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120UL across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 12 MB).
  • 533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 5 120UL better than Core i5-9600KF?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core 5 120UL is ahead with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-9600KF pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core 5 120UL also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-9600KF is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 5 120UL is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-9600KF makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core 5 120UL is 5.7% more expensive on MSRP at $277 MSRP versus $262 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i5-9600KF is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i5-9600KF is also 6.6% better value on MSRP (40.6 vs 38.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120UL is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 5 120ULCore i5-9600KF
1080p
low173 FPS211 FPS
medium141 FPS171 FPS
high117 FPS137 FPS
ultra95 FPS101 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS180 FPS
medium114 FPS144 FPS
high94 FPS115 FPS
ultra77 FPS86 FPS
4K
low79 FPS91 FPS
medium68 FPS78 FPS
high54 FPS62 FPS
ultra43 FPS48 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 5 120ULCore i5-9600KF
1080p
low201 FPS266 FPS
medium171 FPS266 FPS
high155 FPS266 FPS
ultra136 FPS254 FPS
1440p
low177 FPS266 FPS
medium155 FPS266 FPS
high143 FPS261 FPS
ultra123 FPS227 FPS
4K
low138 FPS266 FPS
medium125 FPS243 FPS
high118 FPS218 FPS
ultra102 FPS185 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 5 120ULCore i5-9600KF
1080p
low264 FPS266 FPS
medium264 FPS266 FPS
high264 FPS266 FPS
ultra264 FPS266 FPS
1440p
low264 FPS266 FPS
medium264 FPS266 FPS
high264 FPS266 FPS
ultra264 FPS266 FPS
4K
low264 FPS266 FPS
medium264 FPS249 FPS
high264 FPS211 FPS
ultra249 FPS166 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 5 120ULCore i5-9600KF
1080p
low264 FPS266 FPS
medium264 FPS266 FPS
high264 FPS266 FPS
ultra264 FPS266 FPS
1440p
low264 FPS266 FPS
medium264 FPS266 FPS
high264 FPS266 FPS
ultra264 FPS266 FPS
4K
low264 FPS266 FPS
medium264 FPS266 FPS
high264 FPS266 FPS
ultra264 FPS266 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Core i5-9600KF

Intel

Core 5 120UL

The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-9600KF

The Core i5-9600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,646 points. Launch price was $262.

Processing Power

The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-9600KF offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Core 5 120UL has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-9600KF — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-9600KF uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Core i5-9600KF's 10,646 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-9600KF. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL vs 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9600KF.

FeatureCore 5 120ULCore i5-9600KF
Cores / Threads
10 / 12+67%
6 / 6
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
3.7 GHz+185%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+33%
9 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
10,558
10,646
Cinebench R23 Multi
7,301
Geekbench 6 Single
1,600
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-9600KF uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 5 120ULCore i5-9600KF
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120UL) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9600KF). Primary use case: Core i5-9600KF targets Desktop.

FeatureCore 5 120ULCore i5-9600KF
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 5 120UL launched at $277 MSRP, while the Core i5-9600KF debuted at $262. On MSRP ($277 vs $262), the Core i5-9600KF is $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120UL delivers 38.1 pts/$ vs 40.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-9600KF — making the Core i5-9600KF the 6.4% better value option.

FeatureCore 5 120ULCore i5-9600KF
MSRP
$277
$262-5%
Performance per Dollar
38.1
40.6+7%
Release Date
2024
2019