
Core 5 120UL
Popular choices:

Core i5-9600KF
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 10,646).
- ❌5.7% HIGHER MSRP$277 MSRPvs$262 MSRP
Core i5-9600KF
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120UL across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 5 120UL
2024Core i5-9600KF
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 10,646).
- ❌5.7% HIGHER MSRP$277 MSRPvs$262 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120UL across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120UL better than Core i5-9600KF?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 166 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 266 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Core i5-9600KF

Core 5 120UL
Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-9600KF
Core i5-9600KF
The Core i5-9600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,646 points. Launch price was $262.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-9600KF offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Core 5 120UL has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-9600KF — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-9600KF uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Core i5-9600KF's 10,646 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-9600KF. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL vs 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9600KF.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+185% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+33% | 9 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 10,558 | 10,646 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 7,301 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,200 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-9600KF uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120UL) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9600KF). Primary use case: Core i5-9600KF targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core 5 120UL launched at $277 MSRP, while the Core i5-9600KF debuted at $262. On MSRP ($277 vs $262), the Core i5-9600KF is $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120UL delivers 38.1 pts/$ vs 40.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-9600KF — making the Core i5-9600KF the 6.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $277 | $262-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.1 | 40.6+7% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












