Core 5 120UL vs Xeon E-2126G

Intel

Core 5 120UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E-2126G

6 Cores6 Thrd80 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 120UL

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +24.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $2,425 less on MSRP ($277 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
  • Delivers 886.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E-2126G

2018

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (10,437 vs 10,558).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
    • 433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
    • Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core 5 120UL better than Xeon E-2126G?
    Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E-2126G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 5 120UL is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core 5 120UL is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 24.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 120UL is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 12 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core 5 120UL is the smarter buy today. Core 5 120UL is $2,425 cheaper on MSRP at $277 MSRP versus $2,702 MSRP, and it gives you a 24.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 886.8% better value on MSRP (38.1 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core 5 120UL is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/6. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore 5 120ULXeon E-2126G
    1080p
    low173 FPS172 FPS
    medium141 FPS140 FPS
    high117 FPS111 FPS
    ultra95 FPS92 FPS
    1440p
    low144 FPS149 FPS
    medium114 FPS121 FPS
    high94 FPS96 FPS
    ultra77 FPS80 FPS
    4K
    low79 FPS83 FPS
    medium68 FPS73 FPS
    high54 FPS57 FPS
    ultra43 FPS45 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore 5 120ULXeon E-2126G
    1080p
    low201 FPS261 FPS
    medium171 FPS258 FPS
    high155 FPS232 FPS
    ultra136 FPS202 FPS
    1440p
    low177 FPS261 FPS
    medium155 FPS232 FPS
    high143 FPS211 FPS
    ultra123 FPS183 FPS
    4K
    low138 FPS227 FPS
    medium125 FPS191 FPS
    high118 FPS175 FPS
    ultra102 FPS147 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore 5 120ULXeon E-2126G
    1080p
    low264 FPS261 FPS
    medium264 FPS261 FPS
    high264 FPS261 FPS
    ultra264 FPS261 FPS
    1440p
    low264 FPS261 FPS
    medium264 FPS261 FPS
    high264 FPS261 FPS
    ultra264 FPS261 FPS
    4K
    low264 FPS261 FPS
    medium264 FPS239 FPS
    high264 FPS202 FPS
    ultra249 FPS159 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore 5 120ULXeon E-2126G
    1080p
    low264 FPS261 FPS
    medium264 FPS261 FPS
    high264 FPS261 FPS
    ultra264 FPS261 FPS
    1440p
    low264 FPS261 FPS
    medium264 FPS261 FPS
    high264 FPS261 FPS
    ultra264 FPS261 FPS
    4K
    low264 FPS261 FPS
    medium264 FPS261 FPS
    high264 FPS261 FPS
    ultra264 FPS261 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Xeon E-2126G

    Intel

    Core 5 120UL

    The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Xeon E-2126G

    The Xeon E-2126G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,437 points. Launch price was $255.

    Processing Power

    The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2126G offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Core 5 120UL has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2126G — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 120UL (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E-2126G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Xeon E-2126G's 10,437 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 5 120UL. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureCore 5 120ULXeon E-2126G
    Cores / Threads
    10 / 12+67%
    6 / 6
    Boost Clock
    4.6 GHz+2%
    4.5 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.3 GHz
    3.3 GHz+154%
    L3 Cache
    12 MB (total)
    12 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1.25 MB (per core)+400%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    10 nm-29%
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
    Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
    PassMark
    10,558+1%
    10,437
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2126G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore 5 120ULXeon E-2126G
    Socket
    LGA1700
    LGA1151
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+67%
    PCIe 3.0
    💰

    Value Analysis

    The Core 5 120UL launched at $277 MSRP, while the Xeon E-2126G debuted at $2702. On MSRP ($277 vs $2702), the Core 5 120UL is $2425 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120UL delivers 38.1 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2126G — making the Core 5 120UL the 163.2% better value option.

    FeatureCore 5 120ULXeon E-2126G
    MSRP
    $277-90%
    $2702
    Performance per Dollar
    38.1+877%
    3.9
    Release Date
    2024
    2018