
Core 5 120UL
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2126G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,425 less on MSRP ($277 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 886.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon E-2126G
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,437 vs 10,558).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 5 120UL
2024Xeon E-2126G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,425 less on MSRP ($277 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 886.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,437 vs 10,558).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120UL better than Xeon E-2126G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 147 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 159 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 261 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Xeon E-2126G

Core 5 120UL
Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E-2126G
Xeon E-2126G
The Xeon E-2126G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,437 points. Launch price was $255.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2126G offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Core 5 120UL has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2126G — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 120UL (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E-2126G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Xeon E-2126G's 10,437 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 5 120UL. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+154% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 10,558+1% | 10,437 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2126G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core 5 120UL launched at $277 MSRP, while the Xeon E-2126G debuted at $2702. On MSRP ($277 vs $2702), the Core 5 120UL is $2425 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120UL delivers 38.1 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2126G — making the Core 5 120UL the 163.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $277-90% | $2702 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.1+877% | 3.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












