Core 5 120UL vs Xeon E5-4620 v3

Intel

Core 5 120UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4620 v3

10 Cores20 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2015

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 120UL

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $277 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4620 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4620 v3

2015

Why buy it

  • +108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (10,525 vs 10,558).
  • 600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 5 120UL better than Xeon E5-4620 v3?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4620 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 5 120UL is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core 5 120UL is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 5 120UL is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 5 120UL is the smarter buy today. Core 5 120UL is at an unclear MSRP at $277 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (38.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120UL is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2015), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 5 120ULXeon E5-4620 v3
1080p
low173 FPS159 FPS
medium141 FPS138 FPS
high117 FPS112 FPS
ultra95 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS134 FPS
medium114 FPS113 FPS
high94 FPS89 FPS
ultra77 FPS72 FPS
4K
low79 FPS62 FPS
medium68 FPS56 FPS
high54 FPS44 FPS
ultra43 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 5 120ULXeon E5-4620 v3
1080p
low201 FPS192 FPS
medium171 FPS173 FPS
high155 FPS151 FPS
ultra136 FPS124 FPS
1440p
low177 FPS165 FPS
medium155 FPS152 FPS
high143 FPS133 FPS
ultra123 FPS109 FPS
4K
low138 FPS108 FPS
medium125 FPS100 FPS
high118 FPS89 FPS
ultra102 FPS71 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 5 120ULXeon E5-4620 v3
1080p
low264 FPS263 FPS
medium264 FPS263 FPS
high264 FPS263 FPS
ultra264 FPS263 FPS
1440p
low264 FPS263 FPS
medium264 FPS263 FPS
high264 FPS263 FPS
ultra264 FPS263 FPS
4K
low264 FPS263 FPS
medium264 FPS263 FPS
high264 FPS263 FPS
ultra249 FPS263 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 5 120ULXeon E5-4620 v3
1080p
low264 FPS263 FPS
medium264 FPS263 FPS
high264 FPS263 FPS
ultra264 FPS263 FPS
1440p
low264 FPS263 FPS
medium264 FPS263 FPS
high264 FPS263 FPS
ultra264 FPS263 FPS
4K
low264 FPS263 FPS
medium264 FPS263 FPS
high264 FPS263 FPS
ultra264 FPS263 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Xeon E5-4620 v3

Intel

Core 5 120UL

The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-4620 v3

The Xeon E5-4620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,525 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, matching the Xeon E5-4620 v3's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 v3 — a 55.6% clock advantage for the Core 5 120UL (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Xeon E5-4620 v3's 10,525 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 5 120UL. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620 v3.

FeatureCore 5 120ULXeon E5-4620 v3
Cores / Threads
10 / 12
10 / 20
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+77%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
2 GHz+54%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
25 MB (total)+108%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
10,558
10,525
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 5 120ULXeon E5-4620 v3
Socket
LGA1700
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0