
Core 5 120UL
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4620 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $277 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4620 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-4620 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,525 vs 10,558).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 5 120UL
2024Xeon E5-4620 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $277 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4620 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,525 vs 10,558).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120UL better than Xeon E5-4620 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 71 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 263 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 263 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Xeon E5-4620 v3

Core 5 120UL
Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4620 v3
Xeon E5-4620 v3
The Xeon E5-4620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,525 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, matching the Xeon E5-4620 v3's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 v3 — a 55.6% clock advantage for the Core 5 120UL (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Xeon E5-4620 v3's 10,525 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 5 120UL. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620 v3.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12 | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+77% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+108% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 10,558 | 10,525 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-4620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












