
Core 5 120UL
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2470 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1356 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 10,701).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2470 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $277 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2470 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2470 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1356, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 5 120UL
2024Xeon E5-2470 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1356 and older memory support.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,558 vs 10,701).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2470 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $277 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2470 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1356, while Core 5 120UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120UL better than Xeon E5-2470 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-2470 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-2470 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 109 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-2470 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 268 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-2470 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 268 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120UL and Xeon E5-2470 v2

Core 5 120UL
Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2470 v2
Xeon E5-2470 v2
The Xeon E5-2470 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,701 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2470 v2's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2470 v2 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Core 5 120UL (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 5 120UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2470 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120UL scores 10,558 against the Xeon E5-2470 v2's 10,701 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2470 v2. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2470 v2.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-2470 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12 | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+44% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz+85% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+108% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 10,558 | 10,701+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2470 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120UL | Xeon E5-2470 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












