
Ryzen 3 4100
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4208
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 4100
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4208, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4208 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4208
2019Why buy it
- ✅+37.4% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 4100 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,040 vs 11,062).
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
Ryzen 3 4100
2022Xeon Silver 4208
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+37.4% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4208, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4208 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 4100 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,040 vs 11,062).
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 4100 better than Xeon Silver 4208?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 4100 and Xeon Silver 4208


Ryzen 3 4100
Ryzen 3 4100
The Ryzen 3 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 11,062 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Silver 4208
Xeon Silver 4208
The Xeon Silver 4208 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 11,040 points. Launch price was $417.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 4100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4208 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4208 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4100 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4208 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 4100 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 3 4100 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4208 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 4100 scores 11,062 against the Xeon Silver 4208's 11,040 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 4100. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4100 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4208.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+25% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+81% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8.00391 MB (total) | 11 MB+37% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 11,062 | 11,040 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 4100 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4208 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 4100) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4208).
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon Silver 4208 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













