
Ryzen 3 4100
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2628L v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 4100
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2628L v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,062 vs 11,079).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2628L v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2628L v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2628L v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+274.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
Ryzen 3 4100
2022Xeon E5-2628L v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+274.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2628L v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,062 vs 11,079).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2628L v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2628L v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2628L v4 better than Ryzen 3 4100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2628L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2628L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2628L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 235 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2628L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 4100 and Xeon E5-2628L v4


Ryzen 3 4100
Ryzen 3 4100
The Ryzen 3 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 11,062 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2628L v4
Xeon E5-2628L v4
The Xeon E5-2628L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,079 points. Launch price was $1,364.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 4100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2628L v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2628L v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4100 versus 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2628L v4 — a 71.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 4100. The Ryzen 3 4100 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2628L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 4100 scores 11,062 against the Xeon E5-2628L v4's 11,079 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2628L v4. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4100 vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2628L v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2628L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 12 / 24+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+111% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 8.00391 MB (total) | 30 MB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 3 MB+500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 11,062 | 11,079 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













