
Ryzen 3 4100
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2643 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 4100
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,453 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1473.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.7 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2643 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2643 v4, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon E5-2643 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+149.9% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,024 vs 11,062).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 111.7 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
Ryzen 3 4100
2022Xeon E5-2643 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,453 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1473.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.7 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+149.9% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2643 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2643 v4, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,024 vs 11,062).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 111.7 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 4100 better than Xeon E5-2643 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2643 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2643 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 110 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2643 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 246 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2643 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 4100 and Xeon E5-2643 v4


Ryzen 3 4100
Ryzen 3 4100
The Ryzen 3 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 11,062 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2643 v4
Xeon E5-2643 v4
The Xeon E5-2643 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 11,024 points. Launch price was $1,552.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 4100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2643 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4100 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 v4 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 4100 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 4100 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 4100 scores 11,062 against the Xeon E5-2643 v4's 11,024 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 4100. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4100 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2643 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2643 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+8% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8.00391 MB (total) | 20 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.5 MB+200% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 11,062 | 11,024 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 4100 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2643 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 4100 launched at $99 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 debuted at $1552. On MSRP ($99 vs $1552), the Ryzen 3 4100 is $1453 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 4100 delivers 111.7 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2643 v4 — making the Ryzen 3 4100 the 176.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 4100 | Xeon E5-2643 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-94% | $1552 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.7+1473% | 7.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













