Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2692 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 3 3100

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 12,119).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2692 v2, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2692 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2692 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 3100 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.

Ryzen 3 3100

2020

Xeon E5-2692 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 12,119).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2692 v2, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2692 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 3100 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 3100 better than Xeon E5-2692 v2?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2692 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 3100 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2692 v2 is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 3100 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 3 3100 is at an unclear MSRP at $99 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-2692 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (120.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3100 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 3 3100 Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2692 v2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 3 3100	Xeon E5-2692 v2
1080p
low	166 FPS	163 FPS
medium	136 FPS	139 FPS
high	118 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	144 FPS	139 FPS
medium	115 FPS	115 FPS
high	94 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	65 FPS
medium	58 FPS	58 FPS
high	46 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	35 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 3100 Open Xeon E5-2692 v2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 3 3100	Xeon E5-2692 v2
1080p
low	271 FPS	181 FPS
medium	228 FPS	163 FPS
high	191 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	147 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	231 FPS	156 FPS
medium	200 FPS	144 FPS
high	169 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	165 FPS	102 FPS
medium	148 FPS	95 FPS
high	118 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	67 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 3100 Open Xeon E5-2692 v2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 3 3100	Xeon E5-2692 v2
1080p
low	298 FPS	303 FPS
medium	298 FPS	303 FPS
high	298 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	298 FPS	303 FPS
1440p
low	298 FPS	303 FPS
medium	298 FPS	303 FPS
high	298 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	298 FPS	303 FPS
4K
low	298 FPS	303 FPS
medium	268 FPS	303 FPS
high	226 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	229 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 3100 Open Xeon E5-2692 v2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 3 3100	Xeon E5-2692 v2
1080p
low	298 FPS	303 FPS
medium	298 FPS	303 FPS
high	298 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	298 FPS	303 FPS
1440p
low	298 FPS	303 FPS
medium	298 FPS	303 FPS
high	298 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	298 FPS	303 FPS
4K
low	298 FPS	303 FPS
medium	298 FPS	303 FPS
high	298 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	298 FPS	303 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 3100 Open Xeon E5-2692 v2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3100 and Xeon E5-2692 v2

Ryzen 3 3100

The Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,928 points. Launch price was $99.

Xeon E5-2692 v2

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,119 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2692 v2 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3100 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2692 v2 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3100 scores 11,928 against the Xeon E5-2692 v2's 12,119 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2692 v2. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3100 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2692 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 3 3100	Xeon E5-2692 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+30%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+64%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	11,928	12,119+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2692 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.