
Ryzen 3 3100
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 210
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 3100
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 12,155).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 3 3100
2020Ryzen 3 PRO 210
2025Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 12,155).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 210 better than Ryzen 3 3100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 297 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 304 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210


Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100
The Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,928 points. Launch price was $99.


Ryzen 3 PRO 210
Ryzen 3 PRO 210
The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,155 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3100 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3100 scores 11,928 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 210's 12,155 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 210. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3100 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 11,928 | 12,155+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 3100) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 210). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 3100 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 3100 launched at $99 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($99 vs $0), the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is $99 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.5 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












