
Ryzen 3 3100
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 3100
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 12,073).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 3 3100
2020Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 12,073).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U better than Ryzen 3 3100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 75 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 284 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U


Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100
The Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,928 points. Launch price was $99.


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,073 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 3100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3100 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U uses Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3100 scores 11,928 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U's 12,073 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3100 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 11,928 | 12,073+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 3100) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 3100 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












