Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-2663 V3

AMD

Ryzen 3 3100

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2663 V3

10 Cores20 Thrd105 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2014

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 3 3100

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2663 V3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2663 V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2663 V3

2014

Why buy it

  • +56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (11,777 vs 11,928).
  • 61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 3100 better than Xeon E5-2663 V3?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2663 V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 3100 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 3100 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 3100 is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 3100 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 3 3100 is at an unclear MSRP at $99 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (120.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 3100 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 3 3100Xeon E5-2663 V3
1080p
low166 FPS163 FPS
medium136 FPS141 FPS
high118 FPS115 FPS
ultra93 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS136 FPS
medium115 FPS115 FPS
high94 FPS91 FPS
ultra72 FPS74 FPS
4K
low68 FPS63 FPS
medium58 FPS57 FPS
high46 FPS44 FPS
ultra36 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 3 3100Xeon E5-2663 V3
1080p
low271 FPS294 FPS
medium228 FPS294 FPS
high191 FPS258 FPS
ultra147 FPS213 FPS
1440p
low231 FPS284 FPS
medium200 FPS260 FPS
high169 FPS227 FPS
ultra133 FPS185 FPS
4K
low165 FPS184 FPS
medium148 FPS168 FPS
high118 FPS146 FPS
ultra89 FPS116 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 3 3100Xeon E5-2663 V3
1080p
low298 FPS294 FPS
medium298 FPS294 FPS
high298 FPS294 FPS
ultra298 FPS294 FPS
1440p
low298 FPS294 FPS
medium298 FPS294 FPS
high298 FPS294 FPS
ultra298 FPS294 FPS
4K
low298 FPS294 FPS
medium268 FPS294 FPS
high226 FPS290 FPS
ultra179 FPS240 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 3 3100Xeon E5-2663 V3
1080p
low298 FPS294 FPS
medium298 FPS294 FPS
high298 FPS294 FPS
ultra298 FPS294 FPS
1440p
low298 FPS294 FPS
medium298 FPS294 FPS
high298 FPS294 FPS
ultra298 FPS294 FPS
4K
low298 FPS294 FPS
medium298 FPS294 FPS
high298 FPS294 FPS
ultra298 FPS294 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3100 and Xeon E5-2663 V3

AMD

Ryzen 3 3100

The Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,928 points. Launch price was $99.

Intel

Xeon E5-2663 V3

The Xeon E5-2663 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,777 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 3100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2663 V3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2663 V3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3100 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2663 V3 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2663 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3100 scores 11,928 against the Xeon E5-2663 V3's 11,777 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 3100. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3100 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2663 V3.

FeatureRyzen 3 3100Xeon E5-2663 V3
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+11%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+29%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
25 MB (total)+56%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
7 nm-68%
22 nm
Architecture
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
11,928+1%
11,777
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2663 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 3100Xeon E5-2663 V3
Socket
AM4
LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 3100) / not specified (Xeon E5-2663 V3). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 3100 targets Desktop.

FeatureRyzen 3 3100Xeon E5-2663 V3
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop