
Ryzen 3 3100
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2663 V3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 3100
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2663 V3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2663 V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2663 V3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,777 vs 11,928).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Ryzen 3 3100
2020Xeon E5-2663 V3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2663 V3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2663 V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,777 vs 11,928).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 3100 better than Xeon E5-2663 V3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon E5-2663 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon E5-2663 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon E5-2663 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon E5-2663 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 294 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3100 and Xeon E5-2663 V3


Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100
The Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,928 points. Launch price was $99.

Xeon E5-2663 V3
Xeon E5-2663 V3
The Xeon E5-2663 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,777 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 3100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2663 V3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2663 V3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3100 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2663 V3 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2663 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3100 scores 11,928 against the Xeon E5-2663 V3's 11,777 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 3100. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3100 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2663 V3.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon E5-2663 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+11% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+56% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 11,928+1% | 11,777 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 3100 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2663 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon E5-2663 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 3100) / not specified (Xeon E5-2663 V3). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 3100 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Xeon E5-2663 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












