
Ryzen 3 3100
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 3100
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +48.5% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 120.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Ryzen 3 3100
2020Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +48.5% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 120.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 3 3100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 7 3700X


Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100
The Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,928 points. Launch price was $99.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 3100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3100 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 12% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). Both are built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture using a 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 3100 scores 11,928 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 61.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3100 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 11,928 | 22,430+88% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 3 3100) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 3100) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 3100 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 3100 launched at $99 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($99 vs $329), the Ryzen 3 3100 is $230 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 3100 delivers 120.5 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 3 3100 the 55.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 3100 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-70% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.5+77% | 68.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












