
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 165W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅115.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌65% higher power demand at 165W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 165W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅115.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌65% higher power demand at 165W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon RX 7600

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 125.5%. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353 | 16,581+125% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+1211% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 2655 MHz+136% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+13% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 980M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 980M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 80% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 288 GB/s+80% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 49.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 980M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-39% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5 | 100.5+37% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $269 |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #344 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












