
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅13.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Quadro P4000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅13.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P4000 (móvel) better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 980M make more sense than Quadro P4000 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 84 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and Quadro P4000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 and the Quadro P4000 (móvel) reaches 7,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P4000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1228 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353 | 7,500+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1792+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 4.398 TFLOPS+165% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 1228 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 96 | 112+17% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 672 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the Quadro P4000 (móvel)'s 100W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5 | 75.0+2% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro P4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $819 |
| Codename | GM204 | GP104 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #344 | #326 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












