GeForce GTX 980M vs GRID P40-24Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980M

2014Core: 1038 MHzBoost: 1127 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

GRID P40-24Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 980M

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

GRID P40-24Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 980M better than GRID P40-24Q?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,353 vs 7,057 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 980M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (100W vs 225W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 980M is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 980M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 980M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $5,699 MSRP, and you are getting 4.2% higher G3D Mark. GRID P40-24Q really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does GRID P40-24Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 980M?
Yes. GRID P40-24Q is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $5,699 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 980M. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 980M currently gives you 4.2% higher G3D Mark. GRID P40-24Q still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
1080p
low81 FPS104 FPS
medium69 FPS90 FPS
high58 FPS73 FPS
ultra38 FPS44 FPS
1440p
low71 FPS91 FPS
medium62 FPS80 FPS
high46 FPS58 FPS
ultra29 FPS33 FPS
4K
low25 FPS29 FPS
medium24 FPS27 FPS
high16 FPS18 FPS
ultra14 FPS16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
1080p
low162 FPS162 FPS
medium136 FPS128 FPS
high112 FPS94 FPS
ultra82 FPS75 FPS
1440p
low114 FPS119 FPS
medium89 FPS92 FPS
high71 FPS74 FPS
ultra50 FPS57 FPS
4K
low49 FPS68 FPS
medium41 FPS52 FPS
high38 FPS43 FPS
ultra29 FPS32 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
1080p
low331 FPS318 FPS
medium265 FPS254 FPS
high221 FPS212 FPS
ultra165 FPS159 FPS
1440p
low248 FPS238 FPS
medium199 FPS191 FPS
high165 FPS159 FPS
ultra124 FPS119 FPS
4K
low165 FPS159 FPS
medium132 FPS127 FPS
high105 FPS106 FPS
ultra75 FPS79 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
1080p
low148 FPS182 FPS
medium123 FPS148 FPS
high108 FPS133 FPS
ultra93 FPS103 FPS
1440p
low111 FPS132 FPS
medium94 FPS110 FPS
high83 FPS99 FPS
ultra70 FPS77 FPS
4K
low64 FPS77 FPS
medium52 FPS60 FPS
high40 FPS49 FPS
ultra31 FPS36 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and GRID P40-24Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980M

The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-24Q

The GRID P40-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,057 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 and the GRID P40-24Q reaches 7,057 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID P40-24Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-24Q). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-24Q). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
G3D Mark Score
7,353+4%
7,057
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2048+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.659 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+191%
Boost Clock
1127 MHz
1178 MHz+5%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
96
128+33%
L1 Cache
576 KB
768 KB+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 980M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P40-24Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12.0 (GRID P40-24Q). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
DirectX
12.1
12.0
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-24Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-24Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
Encoder
NVENC 2.0
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the GRID P40-24Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 980M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 350W (GRID P40-24Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
TDP
100W-56%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Perf/Watt
73.5+134%
31.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P40-24Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MGRID P40-24Q
MSRP
$5699
Codename
GM204
GM204
Release
October 7 2014
August 30 2015
Ranking
#344
#433