
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 580X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅32.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 980M: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 980M is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅32.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 980M: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 980M is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 580X better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 85 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon Pro 580X

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 and the Radeon Pro 580X reaches 7,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353 | 7,540+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2304+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS+233% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 1200 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 580X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580X has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 980M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-33% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5+46% | 50.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 580X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $600 |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | March 18 2019 |
| Ranking | #344 | #339 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












