
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

Quadro T2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅245.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌61.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 62W.
Quadro T2000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 100W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 980M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Quadro T2000
2010Why buy it
- ✅245.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 100W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌61.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 62W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 980M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 980M better than Quadro T2000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro T2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 23 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and Quadro T2000

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

Quadro T2000
Quadro T2000
The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 and the Quadro T2000 reaches 7,279 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro T2000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 192 (Quadro T2000). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353+1% | 7,279 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+700% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS+246% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+125% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T2000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) — the GeForce GTX 980M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the Quadro T2000's 62W — a 46.9% difference. The Quadro T2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 350W (Quadro T2000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 62W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5 | 117.4+60% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $600 |
| Codename | GM204 | GF106 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #344 | #902 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












