
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

RTXA5000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 211.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 230W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌212.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌84% higher power demand at 230W vs 125W.
CMP 30HX
2021RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 211.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 230W, a 105W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌212.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌84% higher power demand at 230W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTXA5000-8Q better than CMP 30HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is CMP 30HX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and RTXA5000-8Q

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

RTXA5000-8Q
RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the RTXA5000-8Q reaches 4,916 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 4,916 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 8192+482% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+452% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+5% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 256+191% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 8 MB+471% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 6 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTXA5000-8Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 30HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 6 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 59.2% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-46% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+83% | 21.4 |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500. The CMP 30HX costs 68% less ($1701 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) — the CMP 30HX offers 205% better value.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-68% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1+205% | 2.0 |
| Codename | TU116 | GA102 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #447 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












