
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌432.7% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1630
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 443.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
CMP 30HX
2021GeForce GTX 1630
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 443.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌432.7% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1630 better than CMP 30HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does CMP 30HX make more sense than GeForce GTX 1630?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 6 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and GeForce GTX 1630

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the GeForce GTX 1630 reaches 4,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1630 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 1630). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 4,992+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+175% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+175% | 1.828 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+175% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1630 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 30HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1630 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630). Decoder: No vs NVDEC 4th gen.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 6th gen |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 75W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 75W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 229mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 60°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 66.6+70% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150. The GeForce GTX 1630 costs 81.2% less ($649 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 33.3 (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 offers 445.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $150-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 33.3+446% |
| Codename | TU116 | TU117 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | June 28 2022 |
| Ranking | #447 | #444 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












