
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 460 OEM: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
2010Why buy it
- ✅Measures 210mm instead of 229mm, a 19mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
CMP 30HX
2021GeForce GTX 460 OEM
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 460 OEM: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 210mm instead of 229mm, a 19mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 460 OEM better than CMP 30HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does CMP 30HX make more sense than GeForce GTX 460 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and GeForce GTX 460 OEM

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the GeForce GTX 460 OEM reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 460 OEM uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 5,000+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+319% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+475% | 0.8736 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+57% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+218% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 30HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Decoder: No vs PureVideo HD VP4.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | No | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 460 OEM's 150W — a 18.2% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 210mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-17% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 210mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+17% | 33.3 |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2010).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Codename | TU116 | GF104 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | October 11 2010 |
| Ranking | #447 | #829 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












