G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

CMP 30HX

2021

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M395: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M395 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
166.3% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 168.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

CMP 30HX

2021

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M395: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M395 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 168.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
166.3% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 M395 better than CMP 30HX?

Yes. Radeon R9 M395 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 4,934 vs 4,892 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon R9 M395 is a 2015 card with FSR upscaling, while CMP 30HX is a 2021 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

CMP 30HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon R9 M395 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $300 MSRP. Radeon R9 M395 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 M395 is about $499 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting 0.9% higher G3D Mark. CMP 30HX is the newer 2021 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does CMP 30HX make more sense than Radeon R9 M395?

Yes. CMP 30HX is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $799 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 M395. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 M395 currently gives you 0.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 168.6%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

CMP 30HX Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M395 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	CMP 30HX	Radeon R9 M395
1080p
low	124 FPS	77 FPS
medium	110 FPS	63 FPS
high	93 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	109 FPS	67 FPS
medium	92 FPS	54 FPS
high	77 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	49 FPS	24 FPS
medium	46 FPS	23 FPS
high	33 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	13 FPS

Open CMP 30HX Open Radeon R9 M395

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	CMP 30HX	Radeon R9 M395
1080p
low	204 FPS	84 FPS
medium	172 FPS	58 FPS
high	141 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	27 FPS
1440p
low	132 FPS	48 FPS
medium	104 FPS	28 FPS
high	85 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	61 FPS	16 FPS
medium	49 FPS	10 FPS
high	46 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	6 FPS

Open CMP 30HX Open Radeon R9 M395

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	CMP 30HX	Radeon R9 M395
1080p
low	220 FPS	222 FPS
medium	176 FPS	178 FPS
high	147 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	165 FPS	167 FPS
medium	132 FPS	133 FPS
high	110 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	111 FPS
medium	88 FPS	89 FPS
high	73 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	56 FPS

Open CMP 30HX Open Radeon R9 M395

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	CMP 30HX	Radeon R9 M395
1080p
low	220 FPS	129 FPS
medium	176 FPS	105 FPS
high	147 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	73 FPS
1440p
low	165 FPS	97 FPS
medium	132 FPS	80 FPS
high	110 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	57 FPS
medium	86 FPS	44 FPS
high	73 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	26 FPS

Open CMP 30HX Open Radeon R9 M395

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and Radeon R9 M395

CMP 30HX

The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).

Feature	CMP 30HX	Radeon R9 M395
G3D Mark Score	4,892	4,934
Architecture	Turing	GCN
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1408	1792+27%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	CMP 30HX	Radeon R9 M395
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	CMP 30HX	Radeon R9 M395
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	CMP 30HX	Radeon R9 M395
DirectX	12	12 (FL12_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: No vs VCE.

Feature	CMP 30HX	Radeon R9 M395
Encoder	No	UVD
Decoder	No	VCE
Codecs		H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	CMP 30HX	Radeon R9 M395
TDP	125W	75W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	39.1	65.8+68%

💰

Value Analysis

The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M395 costs 62.5% less ($499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the Radeon R9 M395 offers 168.9% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).