
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

Radeon 860M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
CMP 30HX
2021Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is CMP 30HX better than Radeon 860M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 860M make more sense than CMP 30HX?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and Radeon 860M

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Radeon 860M reaches 4,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Radeon 860M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 512 (Radeon 860M). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 3000 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892+1% | 4,838 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+175% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+64% | 3.072 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 3000 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 88+175% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+2233% | 0.06 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 1 MB (Radeon 860M) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Radeon 860M's 15W — a 157.1% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (Radeon 860M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 15W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 322.5+725% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Codename | TU116 | Krackan Point |
| Release | February 25 2021 | Marchar 2025 |
| Ranking | #447 | #449 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












