
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 12GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌11.4% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 12GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌11.4% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is Intel Arc Pro B60 better than RTX A2000 12GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A2000 12GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 621 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 621 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B60 and RTX A2000 12GB

Intel Arc Pro B60
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX A2000 12GB
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the RTX A2000 12GB reaches 13,721 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 26 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 104.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 13,721 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3328+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+54% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+100% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 160+54% | 104 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 26+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 12GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 196.0+184% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. The RTX A2000 12GB costs 10.2% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the RTX A2000 12GB offers 10.9% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $449-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6 | 30.6+11% |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GA106 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #175 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













