Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Titan X Pascal

CPU

GPU

Intel Arc Pro B60

2025Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Titan X Pascal

2016Core: 1417 MHzBoost: 1531 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Intel Arc Pro B60

8 GB 200

13,807

+1.1%

13,660

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

TITAN V CEO Edition

TITAN RTX

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Intel Arc Pro B60

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $699 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 142.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Titan X Pascal

2016

Why buy it

✅32.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
139.8% HIGHER MSRP
$1,199 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.

Intel Arc Pro B60

2025

Titan X Pascal

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $699 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 142.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.

Why buy it

✅32.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
139.8% HIGHER MSRP
$1,199 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Intel Arc Pro B60 better than Titan X Pascal?

Yes. Intel Arc Pro B60 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Titan X Pascal averages 32.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 13,807 vs 13,660 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Intel Arc Pro B60 is a 2025 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Titan X Pascal is a 2016 model from an older flagship class with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Intel Arc Pro B60 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 5nm process instead of 16nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Intel Arc Pro B60 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Intel Arc Pro B60 is about $699 cheaper on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $1,199 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 142.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Titan X Pascal still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Titan X Pascal is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,199 MSRP, even if Intel Arc Pro B60 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel Arc Pro B60 Benchmark Check

Titan X Pascal Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Intel Arc Pro B60	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	64 FPS	146 FPS
medium	46 FPS	130 FPS
high	36 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	51 FPS	126 FPS
medium	29 FPS	103 FPS
high	19 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	33 FPS	73 FPS
medium	20 FPS	62 FPS
high	14 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	41 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro B60 Open Titan X Pascal

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Intel Arc Pro B60	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	216 FPS	339 FPS
medium	162 FPS	296 FPS
high	117 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	177 FPS
1440p
low	124 FPS	215 FPS
medium	86 FPS	187 FPS
high	66 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	121 FPS
4K
low	51 FPS	104 FPS
medium	38 FPS	88 FPS
high	32 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	57 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro B60 Open Titan X Pascal

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Intel Arc Pro B60	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	621 FPS	615 FPS
medium	497 FPS	492 FPS
high	414 FPS	410 FPS
ultra	311 FPS	307 FPS
1440p
low	466 FPS	461 FPS
medium	373 FPS	369 FPS
high	311 FPS	307 FPS
ultra	233 FPS	231 FPS
4K
low	311 FPS	307 FPS
medium	249 FPS	246 FPS
high	207 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	154 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro B60 Open Titan X Pascal

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Intel Arc Pro B60	Titan X Pascal
1080p
low	621 FPS	519 FPS
medium	497 FPS	449 FPS
high	414 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	311 FPS	307 FPS
1440p
low	466 FPS	422 FPS
medium	373 FPS	367 FPS
high	311 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	233 FPS	231 FPS
4K
low	311 FPS	259 FPS
medium	249 FPS	246 FPS
high	207 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	154 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro B60 Open Titan X Pascal

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B60 and Titan X Pascal

Intel Arc Pro B60

The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.

Titan X Pascal

The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1531 MHz.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B60	Titan X Pascal
G3D Mark Score	13,807+1%	13,660
Architecture	Xe2	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2560	3584+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.29 TFLOPS+12%	10.97 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+57%	1531 MHz
ROPs	16	96+500%
TMUs	160	224+40%
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B60	Titan X Pascal
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B60	Titan X Pascal
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B60	Titan X Pascal
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B60	Titan X Pascal
Encoder	Xe Media Engine (Battlemage)	NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine (Battlemage)	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 85°C.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B60	Titan X Pascal
TDP	200W-20%	250W
Recommended PSU	500W-17%	600W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	112mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	82-4%	85°C
Perf/Watt	69.0+26%	54.6

💰

Value Analysis

The Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. The Intel Arc Pro B60 costs 58.3% less ($699 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 142.1% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).