
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌31.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅9.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅9.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌31.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 better than Intel Arc Pro B60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B60 make more sense than Radeon RX 5700?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 621 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 161 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 621 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 311 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 115 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B60 and Radeon RX 5700

Intel Arc Pro B60
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the Radeon RX 5700 reaches 14,296 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 14,296+4% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+55% | 7.949 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+39% | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro B60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon RX 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 270mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 180W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 270mm |
| Height | 112mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82-4% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 79.4+15% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. The Radeon RX 5700 costs 24.2% less ($121 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 36.6% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $379-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6 | 37.7+37% |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 10 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #175 | #167 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













